https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124959
Nandhini <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Nandhini <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 85018 --> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=85018&action=edit successful replication & generalization of the bug Comment: Scenario 1: User would visually expect a select from (1,1) to (5,5) to include all cells in the range, even if cell (4,5) & (5,5) are merged together. But instead, this bug causes the selection to miss cells (5,1), (5,2), (5,3), (5,4). The user does not expect such a behavior. Scenario 2: Also, instead of (4,5)&(5,5), the cells merged are (5,4)&(5,5), this bug doesn’t show up. Hence, if the user experiences this scenario ahead of the previous one, he/she would see an inconsistency within the product. WRT attachment & 124153 The delete column operation combined with horizontally merged cells results in an unexpected result (data loss). But, delete row combined with vertically merged cells did not cause any trouble. This might be because, the merged cell is considered to include all included cells in case of horizontal merge. But not considered in case of vertical merge. Hence, the possible reason for failure in Scenario 1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
