https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122233

orcmid <orc...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|NOT_AN_ISSUE                |---
                 CC|                            |orc...@apache.org
             Status|CLOSED                      |REOPENED

--- Comment #25 from orcmid <orc...@apache.org> ---
I am dissatisfied with the way this conversation went, especially with regard
to folks who are by no means typical end-users claiming what end-users might or
might not do.

We already had an example of a QA person (probably a power user) needing to see
the details.  

Also, kicking the can to SourceForge is strange.  It is about how a service for
us works for *our* users, not typical SourceForge users.  (And so being logged
in is a strange condition.)

I think this should remain open until we have the people who claim it is
important to improve are fully heard.  I just don't think it makes sense to
tell end-users that they need to negotiate with SourceForge themselves.

And Roberto, as a member of the AOO PMC is a great candidate to carry the word
to SourceForge, as he has done here.  I don't want to minimize that and that he
offered something that could be done immediately to improve the situation.  

The issue about ad placement is a companion concern and needs its own
consideration.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.

Reply via email to