https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119599
orcmid <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Issue Type|ENHANCEMENT |DEFECT --- Comment #7 from orcmid <[email protected]> --- (In reply to mroe from comment #6) > (In reply to orcmid from comment #4) > > (In reply to mroe from comment #3) > > > Is this a Win and Mac only issue? AOO 4.1.2 under Ubuntu 64 works as is > > > should. > > > And if so it must be a regression, please look at issue 114489. > > > > It clearly does not work as requested for AOO 4.1.2 and AOO 4.1.1 on Windows > > 10. The use of "All" in the issue may have been over-reaching. I didn't > > change it because I have no knowledge of the Mac and Linux cases. Note that > > this is more recent that Issue #114489#. > > Yes, it is. I only want to show an indication that it was working in earlier > versions, at least under Linux and Mac. Use my example files from > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=71675 to test. If theses not > work with actual versions, this issue is not an ENHANCEMENT rather a DEFECT. > I don't understand, why a defective behaviour should accepted "by design". Sorry, the design is to not open another instance of a document that is already open. It seems that is all that the software was designed to do. There are two aspects to doing something beyond that. One is to bring the document to the front as at least restored (not minimized). The other is to put the focus in that document. If it is working in Apache OpenOffice 3.4 and not now, we can look for a regression. Otherwise, we have to do it from scratch. Knowing that it worked in some OpenOffice.org version is not of much help. This is recognized as an usability issue and a more-helpful behavior is desired. It looks like that takes something new. It's different than looking for a bug in the code. I am clear it looks like a defect to those who are startled by the current behavior. I am changing it back to satisfy you. Thanks for the sample document. Any available existing documents can be used to confirm this and have. Is there something thought to be special about the sample? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
