style95 commented on code in PR #5313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5313#discussion_r949836791


##########
core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/container/ContainerManager.scala:
##########
@@ -157,43 +139,64 @@ class ContainerManager(jobManagerFactory: ActorRefFactory 
=> ActorRef,
     case _ =>
   }
 
-  private def createContainer(msgs: List[ContainerCreationMessage],
-                              memory: ByteSize,
-                              invocationNamespace: String): Unit = {
+  private def createContainer(msgs: List[ContainerCreationMessage], memory: 
ByteSize, invocationNamespace: String)(
+    implicit logging: Logging): Unit = {
     logging.info(this, s"received ${msgs.size} creation message 
[${msgs.head.invocationNamespace}:${msgs.head.action}]")
-    val coldCreations = filterWarmedCreations(msgs)
-    if (coldCreations.nonEmpty)
-      ContainerManager
-        .getAvailableInvokers(etcdClient, memory, invocationNamespace)
-        .flatMap { invokers =>
-          if (invokers.isEmpty) {
-            coldCreations.foreach { msg =>
-              ContainerManager.sendState(
-                FailedCreationJob(
-                  msg.creationId,
-                  msg.invocationNamespace,
-                  msg.action,
-                  msg.revision,
-                  NoAvailableInvokersError,
-                  s"No available invokers."))
-            }
-            Future.failed(NoCapacityException("No available invokers."))
-          } else {
-            coldCreations.foreach { msg =>
-              creationJobManager ! RegisterCreationJob(msg)
-            }
+    ContainerManager
+      .getAvailableInvokers(etcdClient, memory, invocationNamespace)
+      .foreach { invokers =>
+        if (invokers.isEmpty) {
+          msgs.foreach(ContainerManager.sendState(_, NoAvailableInvokersError, 
s"No available invokers."))
+        } else {
+          val (coldCreations, warmedCreations) =
+            ContainerManager.filterWarmedCreations(warmedContainers, 
inProgressWarmedContainers, invokers, msgs)
+
+          // handle warmed creation
+          val chosenInvokers: immutable.Seq[Option[(Int, 
ContainerCreationMessage)]] = warmedCreations.map {
+            warmedCreation =>
+              // update the in-progress map for warmed containers
+              // even if it is done in the filterWarmedCreations method, it is 
still necessary to apply the change to the original map
+              
warmedCreation._3.foreach(inProgressWarmedContainers.update(warmedCreation._1.creationId.asString,
 _))
+
+              // send creation message to the target invoker
+              warmedCreation._2 map { chosenInvoker =>
+                val msg = warmedCreation._1
+                creationJobManager ! RegisterCreationJob(msg)
+                sendCreationContainerToInvoker(messagingProducer, 
chosenInvoker, msg)
+                (chosenInvoker, msg)
+              }
+          }
 
-            Future {
-              ContainerManager
-                .schedule(invokers, coldCreations, memory)
-                .map { pair =>
-                  sendCreationContainerToInvoker(messagingProducer, 
pair.invokerId.toInt, pair.msg)
-                }
+          val updatedInvokers = chosenInvokers.foldLeft(invokers) { (invokers, 
chosenInvoker) =>
+            chosenInvoker match {
+              case Some((chosenInvoker, msg)) =>
+                updateInvokerMemory(chosenInvoker, 
msg.whiskActionMetaData.limits.memory.megabytes, invokers)

Review Comment:
   > Due to warmedContainers already existed in invoker side, seems it will 
just use existing warmed container, it will consume new memory?
   
   I confirmed that warmed container memories are not considered as busy memory.
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to