QWQyyy commented on issue #5429: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5429#issuecomment-1632217334
> Are you able to access the underlying node? Then you would be able to collect container logs. And regarding OOM issue, you may look into the kubernetes events to see if the pod is destroyed by OOM. > > IIRC the flag(`THE_END_OF_A_WHISK_ACTIVATION`) is to denote the end of one activation. A container(pod) can be used and each invocation can leave logs and that flag is to figure out the end of one activation. Well notes, I managed to solve this issue by increasing the memory of a single function container to 16GB, it was indeed caused by the OOM issue, having said that, I still think that OpenWhisk is currently difficult to troubleshoot this issue. So, I want to make some changes to the source code. One is to remove the 1m blocking restriction of the controller, and the other is to connect the OOM of kubernetes with the OpenWhisk message system, because the current OpenWhisk is difficult to determine the OOM problem. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
