HaoWang9909 commented on issue #5526: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5526#issuecomment-2594577231
Hello! Thank you for your attention to this issue and your detailed explanation. I tried using a new scheduler, like the FPCPoolBalancer and the FunctionPullingContainerProxy/Pool, and conducted several deployments and experiments again. However, I still observed the same issue: the first prewarm invocation is significantly slower, while subsequent invocations from different prewarm containers are faster. Additionally, I noticed that the duration of subsequent invocations from prewarm containers is slightly longer when using the scheduler compared to when the scheduler is not used. And I did observe warm-up logs in the system, such as the following: ``` [2025-01-16T05:12:55.996Z] [INFO] [#tid_sid_warmUp] [FPCInvokerReactive] Warm up scheduler <ByteString@92c1745a size=17 contents="whisk/scheduler/0">. ``` Does this indicate that the warm-up process is not working as intended? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
