markusthoemmes commented on a change in pull request #2592: Rename
CliActivationResponse & CliActivation, and change them from inner classes to
classes
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2592#discussion_r132219202
##########
File path: tests/src/test/scala/common/WskTestHelpers.scala
##########
@@ -31,6 +31,55 @@ import spray.json._
import java.time.Instant
/**
+ * An arbitrary response of a whisk action. Includes the result as a JsObject
as the
+ * structure of "result" is not defined.
+ */
+case class activationResponse(result: Option[JsObject], status: String,
success: Boolean)
+
+object activationResponse extends DefaultJsonProtocol {
+ implicit val serdes = jsonFormat3(activationResponse.apply)
+}
+
+/**
+ * Activation record as it is returned by the CLI.
+ */
+ case class activationResult (
+ activationId: String,
+ logs: Option[List[String]],
+ response: activationResponse,
+ start: Instant,
+ end: Option[Instant], // This field is optional in responses of REST
calls.
+ duration: Option[Long], // This field is optional in responses of REST
calls.
Review comment:
That sounds like we should either do the same as the CLI on the API side or
not make them optional on the API side. To me it seems like this is only valid
for trigger/rule activations. Should we reflect that in the types?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
