mrutkows commented on a change in pull request #387: Add trademark guidelines page for OpenWhisk name and logo URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/387#discussion_r293127573
########## File path: _layouts/trademarks.html ########## @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +--- +layout: default +--- +<!-- +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor +# license agreements; and to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0. +--> +<div id="whiskIndexedLayout"> + + <!-- Community Index --> + <div id="whiskIndex"> + <ul> + <li>Trademark Guidelines</li> + + </ul> + </div> + + + <section id="whiskNodes"> + <main class="doc"> + <div class="content"> + <a class="indexable" id="trademarks"></a> + <h2>Apache OpenWhisk Trademark Guidelines</h2> + </div> + </main> + + <main class="doc"> + <div class="content"> + + <p>Apache OpenWhisk, OpenWhisk and the OpenWhisk logo are + <a href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/";>trademarks</a> + of the <a href="https://www.apache.org/";>Apache Software Foundation (ASF)</a>. + The ASF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and as such, needs to take + special care about how its trademarks are used by organizations. + In particular, ASF needs to ensure that its software products are clearly + distinguished from third-party products.</p> + + <p>If you would like to provide software, services, events, or other products + based on Apache OpenWhisk, please refer to the + <a href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/";>ASF trademark policy</a> + and <a href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/";>FAQ</a>. + This page summarizes the key points of the policy, but please note that + the official policy always takes precedence.</p> + + <ul> + <li><strong>Software products,</strong> whether commercial or open source, are not allowed to use “OpenWhisk” in their name, except in the form “powered by Apache OpenWhisk" or “for Apache OpenWhisk” when following + <a href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#products";>these specific + guidelines</a>. + <ul> + <li>Names derived from “OpenWhisk” are also not allowed.</li> + <li>Company names may not include “OpenWhisk”.</li> + <li>Package identifiers (e.g., Maven coordinates) may include Review comment: i think it revolves around any use of "openwhisk" in any URIs (paths) or in system path/classpath relative path names referenced in modules/tooling etc. is allowed; that is, people can reference "openwhisk" when building from any libraries with the name "openwhisk" (that we most likely published as part of our source code or resultant binaries from builds steps). That was what I read... did not confuse me as Maven build files often point to repose/modules with the project names in them (which would be allowed). ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
