[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arpit Agarwal updated HDDS-4904:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
The Ozone website prominently mentions CSI support:

[https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/]

[https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/interface/csi.html]

Our docs gives a false impression to users that CSI is fully functional and 
supported for persistent storage inside containers.

This support uses Fuse+S3 gateway, so it is not appropriate for any serious 
usage. A real CSI solution should use an approach like the cBlocks prototype by 
building directly on top of HDDS containers with a real device driver.

Until that time we should not claim CSI support. Alternatively we should be 
honest with our users that it is a prototype and not suitable for serious usage.

  was:
The Ozone website prominently mentions CSI support:

[https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/]

[https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/interface/csi.html]

This gives a false impression to users that CSI is fully functional and 
supported for persistent storage inside containers.

This CSI support is using Fuse+S3 gateway, so I would not consider it 
appropriate for any serious usage. Any real CSI solution should use an approach 
like cBlocks prototype by building directly on top of HDDS containers with a 
real fuse driver.

Until that time we should not claim CSI support, or at least be honest with our 
users that it is a prototype not suitable for serious usage.


> Remove mention of CSI support
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-4904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The Ozone website prominently mentions CSI support:
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/]
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/interface/csi.html]
> Our docs gives a false impression to users that CSI is fully functional and 
> supported for persistent storage inside containers.
> This support uses Fuse+S3 gateway, so it is not appropriate for any serious 
> usage. A real CSI solution should use an approach like the cBlocks prototype 
> by building directly on top of HDDS containers with a real device driver.
> Until that time we should not claim CSI support. Alternatively we should be 
> honest with our users that it is a prototype and not suitable for serious 
> usage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to