[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17297559#comment-17297559
]
Dinesh Chitlangia edited comment on HDDS-4904 at 3/8/21, 5:28 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~elek], [~arp] I would rather specify "not production ready" vs "alpha" just
to eliminate any misinterpretation.
What do you think of this?
{quote}-Ozone CSI support is not production ready and buckets can be mounted-
-only via 3rd party S3 compatible Fuse implementation (like Goofys). Fuse-
-over S3 can provide only limited performance compared to a native fuse file-
-systems. In the future, Ozone may support a custom solution to mount buckets-
-which provides better user experience (with fuse or NFS or any other-
-solution). Until then, CSI is recommended to use only if you can live with
the-
-limitation, and your use case is tested carefully.-
{quote}
Ah, I had not refreshed the page before posting it.
I see new comment from [~elek] :)
was (Author: dineshchitlangia):
[~elek], [~arp] I would rather specify "not production ready" vs "alpha" just
to eliminate any misinterpretation.
What do you think of this?
{quote}-Ozone CSI support is not production ready and buckets can be mounted-
-only via 3rd party S3 compatible Fuse implementation (like Goofys). Fuse-
-over S3 can provide only limited performance compared to a native fuse file-
-systems. In the future, Ozone may support a custom solution to mount buckets-
-which provides better user experience (with fuse or NFS or any other-
-solution). Until then, CSI is recommended to use only if you can live with
the-
-limitation, and your use case is tested carefully.-
{quote}
Ah, I had not refreshed the page before posting it.
I see new comment form [~elek] :)
> Remove mention of CSI support
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-4904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
> Assignee: Dinesh Chitlangia
> Priority: Critical
>
> The Ozone website prominently mentions CSI support:
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/]
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/interface/csi.html]
> Our docs give a false impression to users that CSI is fully functional and
> supported for persistent storage inside containers.
> This support uses goofys+S3 gateway, so it is not appropriate for any serious
> usage. A real CSI solution should use an approach like the cBlocks prototype
> by building directly on top of HDDS containers with a real device driver.
> Until that time we should not claim CSI support. Alternatively we should be
> honest with our users that it is a prototype and not suitable for serious
> usage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
