[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17298182#comment-17298182
 ] 

Marton Elek commented on HDDS-4904:
-----------------------------------

bq. however this fuse based CSI driver is a dead end

Can you please explain why is it a dead end? Based on my understanding it can 
be a very good solution, but we need native fuse driver instead of an s3 based.

bq. Yes I understand the benefits of a proper CSI driver. The one we have 
currently doesn't meet the bar.

My feeling is that still we talk about two different things. When I talk about 
CSI driver I talk about "hadoop-ozone/csi", while it is very simple I am 
wondering what is missing from there. Not from goofys or from any other fuse 
drivers, but from this specific project?

If I understood well you are unhappy with one specific fuse driver 
implementation which is selected as the default. 

I think it's an existing (alpha) feature of Apache Ozone. It's fair point to 
improve the documentation and make it clean what can it do,  but I would not 
remove it.

(Note: I would have totally different opinion about a vendor dependent 
distribution of Apache Ozone...)

> Remove mention of CSI support
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-4904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4904
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
>            Assignee: Dinesh Chitlangia
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The Ozone website prominently mentions CSI support:
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/]
> [https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/interface/csi.html]
> Our docs give a false impression to users that CSI is fully functional and 
> supported for persistent storage inside containers.
> This support uses goofys+S3 gateway, so it is not appropriate for any serious 
> usage. A real CSI solution should use an approach like the cBlocks prototype 
> by building directly on top of HDDS containers with a real device driver.
> Until that time we should not claim CSI support. Alternatively we should be 
> honest with our users that it is a prototype and not suitable for serious 
> usage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to