adoroszlai commented on PR #7750: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7750#issuecomment-2623792948
> limit the scope of this PR to (1) Yes, (1) can be fixed without controversy. > and maybe create a DOC jira to specify what order of resolution to to expect when `ozone.replication` is configured in ozone-site.xml with bucket-level replication setting also being an option? Yes, I think [doc](https://ozone.apache.org/docs/edge/feature/erasurecoding.html#configurations) needs some clarification. > Is the intent to remove `ozone.replication` usage at some point? I don't know. It was "undocumented" (removed from `ozone-default.xml`) when `ozone.server.default.replication` settings were introduced. We may need to evaluate various interfaces (CLI, Java API, Hadoop FS API, S3) and consider backward compatibility. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
