[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17923387#comment-17923387
 ] 

Ivan Andika edited comment on HDDS-12047 at 2/3/25 5:14 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

> I’m planning to merge the tests into TestOzoneClientMultipartUpload, and I’ve 
> noticed that there are quite a few tests that need to be moved. Would it be 
> better to separate them into multiple PRs?

Each PR requires a single ticket so I'm fine if you can divide them to multiple 
tickets for each task. Otherwise, I think we can simply have a well-formed PR 
where each commit handles a part of the refactoring.

> I was thinking that for the first PR, I could move all the Copy tests from 
> TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO to TestOzoneClientMultipartUpload and 
> apply the bucketLayout parameterized test on them. Does that approach sound 
> reasonable?

Which "Copy" tests in TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO are you referring 
to? I can't seem to find them.

Do you mean to just rename the TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO to 
TestOzoneClientMultipartUpload and add the bucket layout parameterization?




was (Author: JIRAUSER298977):
> I’m planning to merge the tests into TestOzoneClientMultipartUpload, and I’ve 
> noticed that there are quite a few tests that need to be moved. Would it be 
> better to separate them into multiple PRs?

Each PR requires a single ticket so I'm fine if you can divide them to multiple 
tickets for each task. Otherwise, I think we can simply have a well-formed PR 
where each commit handles a part of the refactoring.

> I was thinking that for the first PR, I could move all the Copy tests from 
> TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO to TestOzoneClientMultipartUpload and 
> apply the bucketLayout parameterized test on them. Does that approach sound 
> reasonable?

Which "Copy" tests in TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO are you referring 
to? I can't seem to find them.

Do you mean to just rename the TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO to 
TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWith and add the bucket layout parameterization?



> Merge TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO to OzoneRpcClientTests
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-12047
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12047
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Ivan Andika
>            Assignee: Peter Lee
>            Priority: Major
>
> TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO contains a lot general MPU tests 
> although the test class was intended for FSO. It also contains some 
> duplicates with OzoneRpcClientTests (e.g. 
> testMultipartUploadWithPartsLessThanMinSize). There are cases where MPU 
> related patches only added test cases to 
> TestOzoneClientMultipartUploadWithFSO but not OzoneRpcClientTests
> It's better to merge the tests to OzoneRpcClientTests since it supports 
> BucketLayout parameterization so that the tests do not need to build a new 
> MiniOzoneCluster for each BucketLayout tests and also ensure that new MPU 
> features are tested in both bucket layout.
> For bucket layout specific tests, we can simply use Assumptions.assumeTrue to 
> only run the test if the bucket layout is correct.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to