[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17927945#comment-17927945
]
Krishna Kumar Asawa commented on HDDS-12319:
--------------------------------------------
I believe this is expected as File and Directory Tables are partialcache only
till it is flushed to RocksDB. [~sumitagrawal]
> fileTable directoryTable cache hit rate extremely low
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-12319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12319
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ozone-performance
> Attachments: Screenshot 2025-02-12 at 3.30.08 PM.png, Screenshot
> 2025-02-12 at 3.30.33 PM.png, Screenshot 2025-02-12 at 3.37.55 PM.png,
> Screenshot 2025-02-12 at 3.38.13 PM.png
>
>
> I have access to a production cluster. Looking at the fileTable and
> directoryTable cache metrics, I realized both of them have very low hit rate.
> If the numbers are correct, that means the cache doesn't make much difference:
> fileTable
> table_cache_metrics_hit_count 3524
> table_cache_metrics_miss_count 2564436740
> hit rate: 0.00013741809%
> directoryTable
> table_cache_metrics_hit_count 22190417
> table_cache_metrics_miss_count 8684501508
> hit rate: 0.255517452%
> bucket table and volume table cache are usually hit though
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
