len548 commented on PR #8794: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/8794#issuecomment-3069718278
@adoroszlai Thanks for the review. > I don't think we should add the new service on port 9878, where S3 content is served. If someone has a bucket named sts, it won't be accessible anymore. We could add it on 19878, or may need to introduce a third one. If I introduce it on 19878, there is already s3secret service. Should I introduce it under the s3secret service as sub-service of it? Or completely separate service independent of s3secret endpoint? I guess it would be easier and simpler to do it under s3secret, but do you think there would be any drawback? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ozone.apache.org
