sreejasahithi commented on PR #9591: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9591#issuecomment-3737340905
> Thanks @sreejasahithi for working on this. > > The JIRA description mentions that the issue was resolved after explicitly setting both `ozone.scm.client.address` and `ozone.scm.datanode.address`. However, `ozone.scm.datanode.address` already falls back to `om.scm.names`. Why was it still necessary to set it explicitly in this case? cc: @ssulav It wasn't necessary to explicitly set `ozone.scm.datanode.address` for OMs to stop failing. In non-HA mode, datanodes directly use `ozone.scm.names` via HddsServerUtil.getSCMAddressForDatanodes() -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
