Gargi-jais11 commented on PR #10277: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/10277#issuecomment-4459825112
> Thanks @Gargi-jais11 , I don't think that object tags need to be returned in sorted order in the AWS documentation. Could you help check whether other S3 compatible storage also sort their object tags? If so, I'm OK to go ahead. > > Anyway, the max number of tags is 10, so the sorting overhead should not be noticeable. @ivandika3 you are correct that s3 doesn't return obejct tags in sorted fashion but if you this test case `test_put_modify_tags ` it is failing because of not being sorted in this ozone s3 compatibility run https://ozone.s3.peterxcli.dev/#latest-run-section This is the [ActualTest](https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/blob/8f0ae7b404a3a2fcf7038bf1e6bf29544fe9b6a3/s3tests/functional/test_s3.py#L11991-L12017). Even I was confused what to do with this test and though to raise a PR and can discuss. Not only this test but `test_put_object_with_tags` https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/blob/8f0ae7b404a3a2fcf7038bf1e6bf29544fe9b6a3/s3tests/functional/test_s3.py#L12119-L12144 will also fail due to non ordering although its root cause failure will be handled by this [jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-15259). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
