[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-15093 ]


    Wei-Chiu Chuang deleted comment on HDDS-15093:
    ----------------------------------------

was (Author: jojochuang):
Release note: Added 
{{ozone.scm.container.placement.rack.scatter.capacity.aware.enabled}} (default 
{{false}}). When enabled, the RackScatter EC placement policy makes intra-rack 
datanode selection capacity-aware, picking the less utilized of two randomly 
chosen datanodes so emptier nodes are preferred; disabled by default, so 
existing behavior is unchanged.

> RackScatter policy does not consider node capacity
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-15093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-15093
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Assignee: Chi-Hsuan Huang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> EC container placement adopts rack-scatter policy where stripes are placed in 
> different racks.
>  
> However, the datanode within the same rack is chosen at random. Let's say a 
> rack has both 100TB datanode and 400TB datanode, the 100TB datanode will fill 
> up sooner than the 400TB datanode. There is no capacity consideration 
> implemented intra-rack.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to