[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-16681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-16681:
----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> S3G: Avoid calling getS3Volume by using `getBucketDetails` API.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-16681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-16681
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Chung-En Lee
>            Assignee: Chung-En Lee
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Background & Problem
> In Ozone S3 Gateway (S3G), retrieving bucket metadata via `infoBucket` is on 
> the critical path for many S3 REST operations.
> Currently, before invoking `infoBucket`, S3G frequently executes a separate 
> `getS3VolumeContext` RPC call to OM in order to resolve the underlying volume 
> mapped to the S3 bucket name. This introduces an extra network round trip 
> (RTT).
> Proposed Solution
> Following the pattern established in {*}{{*}}HDDS-7324{{*}}{*} (resolving S3 
> context natively on OM / utilizing `assumeS3Context`):
> 1. OM-side Context Resolution:
>    - Update the `InfoBucket` request protocol to support resolving the S3 
> volume context directly on OM.
>    - If `assumeS3Context` is enabled, OM handles the S3 volume mapping and 
> bucket lookup within a single server-side operation.
> 2. S3G Path Optimization:
>    - Refactor S3G's bucket resolution logic (such as in `BucketEndpoint` and 
> related helper methods) to bypass the explicit pre-call to 
> `getS3VolumeContext`.
>    - Directly invoke the enhanced `infoBucket` RPC, dropping the operation 
> from 2 RPCs to 1 RPC.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to