JacksonYao287 commented on a change in pull request #2435:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/2435#discussion_r678779462
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdds/server-scm/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdds/scm/node/TestDeadNodeHandler.java
##########
@@ -212,6 +208,7 @@ public void testOnMessage() throws Exception {
// First set the node to IN_MAINTENANCE and ensure the container replicas
// are not removed on the dead event
+ datanode1 = nodeManager.getNodeByUuid(datanode1.getUuidString());
Review comment:
thanks @sodonnel for the review!
>How does this change test this feature?
```
for(DatanodeInfo node : nodeStateMap.getAllDatanodeInfos()) {
.....
case STALE:
// Move the node to DEAD if the last heartbeat time is less than
// configured dead-node interval.
updateNodeState(node, deadNodeCondition, status,
NodeLifeCycleEvent.TIMEOUT);
......
}
```
this is the current code in `NodeStateManager`, and it is the only place
where a `DEAD` event is fired and `DeadNodeHandler` is called. So we can see
here when judging the state of all the nodes , we get all the DatanodeInfos
from `nodeStateMap` directly. when a datonode registers itself to scm, it will
be added to `nodeStateMap`. but let us see `nodeStateMap#add`.
```
public void addNode(......)
...........
nodeMap.put(id, new DatanodeInfo(datanodeDetails, nodeStatus,
layoutInfo));
............
}
```
we can see that a new object is created here and added to the map, so the
point here is that, the registered `DatanodeDetails` is not the one which is
stored is `nodeMap` and got by `DeadNodeHandler` when `DEAD` event is fired .
when running test , it will lead to the failure of ` Preconditions.checkState`
in `DeadNodeHandler`. so i think the current test code does not notice this ,
and this is why the change here is made.
>I think we need a test (or extend this test) to ensure the node is removed
from the topology when the dead handler is called and another test to ensure it
is put back when the healthy event is fired.
yea , although i have add a ` Preconditions.checkState` in the handlers , i
think it`s better off adding this . i will do it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
