[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Wei-Chiu Chuang resolved HDDS-10051.
------------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Resolving as Won't Fix based on the clarified design scope: object versioning 
is not intended to coexist with Ozone Snapshots. Version-aware exclusive-size 
accounting for that combination is therefore outside the supported snapshot 
functionality.

This is a scope decision, not a claim that the requested calculation has been 
implemented. The current exclusive-size logic still makes whole-key comparisons 
rather than calculating the difference between overlapping retained object 
versions across snapshots.

If needed, validation that rejects this unsupported combination and explicit 
documentation of the restriction should be tracked separately. This issue will 
not be used to introduce support for combining object versioning with snapshots.

> Exclusive Snapshot size calculation for snapshots buckets with object 
> versioning enabled
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-10051
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10051
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Swaminathan Balachandran
>            Assignee: Saketa Chalamchala
>            Priority: Major
>
> In HDDS-9426 patch for calculating exclusive size, the calculation of the 
> exclusive size for snapshot is not done properly in the case multiple object 
> versions are retained for a particular key. Exclusive size for a particular 
> snapshot should only account for the versions that do not exist in the 
> previous snapshot and are there in the current snapshot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to