shuan1026 opened a new pull request, #11848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/11848

   ## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   `SnapshotCache.cleanup` dequeued a snapshot id on every `dbMap.compute` 
branch, including the keep path that skips eviction because the refcount is 
still positive. A concurrent last `close()` can enqueue that id after the count 
is read and before the dequeue; the key then stays in `dbMap` at refcount 0 and 
is never queued again, so later `lock()` drain checks fail. Mechanism is on 
HDDS-16686.
   
   This patch moves `pendingEvictionQueue.remove` onto the missing-key and 
successful-evict branches only. A still-referenced entry stays queued so the 
next cleanup pass can close it. `close()` throwing `IOException` still skips 
the remove, so the key remains retryable.
   
   `TestSnapshotCache#testCleanupKeepsQueuedKeyWhenStillReferenced` pins that 
dequeue decision: after a close-then-get, `lock()` still fails (refcount > 0), 
but the id stays in the queue and the following `lock()` after `close()` drains 
it.
   
   ## What is the link to the Apache JIRA
   
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-16686
   
   ## How was this patch tested?
   
   - `mvn -pl :ozone-manager test -Dtest=TestSnapshotCache` in 
`hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager`. The new test fails on 
`getPendingEvictionQueue().contains(snapshotId)` after the first `lock()` 
without the production change, and the class passes with it (including 
`testStaleEvictionKeyDuringCleanup` and `testCloseFailureRetriesSnapshot`).
   - ci: https://github.com/shuan1026/ozone/actions/runs/40879545162


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to