ChenSammi commented on a change in pull request #2693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/2693#discussion_r732354311
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/container/common/statemachine/StateContext.java
##########
@@ -616,16 +618,19 @@ public void execute(ExecutorService service, long time,
TimeUnit unit)
}
if (!isThreadPoolAvailable(service)) {
- long count = threadPoolNotAvailableCount.getAndIncrement();
- if (count % getLogWarnInterval(conf) == 0) {
- LOG.warn("No available thread in pool for past {} seconds.",
- unit.toSeconds(time) * (count + 1));
+ long count = threadPoolNotAvailableCount.incrementAndGet();
+ long unavailableTime =
+ System.currentTimeMillis() - lastHeartbeatSent.get();
+ if (unavailableTime > time && count % getLogWarnInterval(conf) == 0) {
+ LOG.warn("No available thread in pool for the past {} seconds " +
+ "and {} times.", unit.toSeconds(unavailableTime), count);
}
return;
}
-
+
threadPoolNotAvailableCount.set(0);
task.execute(service);
+ lastHeartbeatSent.set(System.currentTimeMillis());
Review comment:
Yes, I see that Time.monotonicNow() used in some places, but it involves
a division operation. What's the paticular benifit of using Time.monotonicNow
over System.currentTimeMills? I don't know the story behind, and would you
like to shed some light on it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]