[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Siyao Meng updated HDDS-6063:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
1. We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and 
write requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write 
requests are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as necessary.

2. -We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
cache and DB.- - this is longer the case, see the comment in HDDS-6274

  was:
We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and write 
requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write requests 
are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as necessary.

-We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
cache and DB.- - No longer the case, see the comment in HDDS-6274


> [Multi-Tenant] Use VOLUME_LOCK in read and write requests
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-6063
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6063
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: HDDS-4944
>            Reporter: Ethan Rose
>            Assignee: Siyao Meng
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> 1. We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and 
> write requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write 
> requests are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as 
> necessary.
> 2. -We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
> cache and DB.- - this is longer the case, see the comment in HDDS-6274



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to