[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Siyao Meng updated HDDS-6063:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
1. We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and 
write requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write 
requests are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as necessary.

2. We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
cache and DB.

3. Some minor refactoring, as mentioned in the PR: 

  was:
1. We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and 
write requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write 
requests are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as necessary.

2. We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
cache and DB.


> [Multi-Tenant] Use VOLUME_LOCK in read and write requests, and some minor 
> refactoring
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-6063
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6063
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: HDDS-4944
>            Reporter: Ethan Rose
>            Assignee: Siyao Meng
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> 1. We have decided to use the existing VOLUME_LOCK for multi tenant read and 
> write requests, instead of adding a new lock. We should check that all write 
> requests are using this lock properly, and add it to read requests as 
> necessary.
> 2. We must also fix read requests which are iterating keys to check both the 
> cache and DB.
> 3. Some minor refactoring, as mentioned in the PR: 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to