[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17528916#comment-17528916
 ] 

Neil Joshi commented on HDDS-6433:
----------------------------------

Hi [~hanishakoneru] ,  thanks for this.  I've overlooked this comment 
unfortunately prior to calling to merge the feature branch to the master.  I 
apologize.  I discussed doing this Jira issue and submitting it into the master 
branch after the merge in a few community meetings and was under the impression 
that it would be alright to do so.

I will be updating this Jira shortly with a patch for refactoring the 
OMFailoverProxyProvider as you suggested.  Thanks!

 

> Refactor OMFailoverProxyProvider to provide a base for OM and GrpcOM 
> FailoverProxyProviders
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-6433
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6433
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Hanisha Koneru
>            Assignee: Neil Joshi
>            Priority: Major
>
> HDDS-5544 added GrpcOMFailoverProxyProvider which implements 
> OMFailoverProxyProvider but it does not need most of the logic in 
> OMFailoverProxyProvider and sets some map values as null as it is not 
> required for Grpc. 
> For keeping the same underlying failover proxy, instead of 
> GrpcOMFailoverProxyProvider implementing OMFailoverProxyProvider, there 
> should be a base interface/ class that these two can can implement. 
> Please refer to 
> [this|https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/2901#issuecomment-1058492345] 
> comment in HDDS-5544.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to