[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17538115#comment-17538115
]
Attila Doroszlai commented on HDDS-6758:
----------------------------------------
bq. I have a use case where in I need to get the bucket layout, but if the
bucket is a link then I need to perform another bucket-info call on the source
bucket.
bq. Since we already have the OzoneBucket object, we can add the layout as well
here. Should that be ok?
The additional bucket info call is inevitable. Here {{OzoneBucket}} represents
the link bucket, not the source bucket. It is converted to another object to
avoid printing information not applicable to links.
Adding layout to the output would be confusing, too.
> Ozone bucket Info doesn’t print bucket layout for linked buckets
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-6758
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6758
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sadanand Shenoy
> Assignee: Sadanand Shenoy
> Priority: Major
>
> The ozone sh bucket info command doesn’t print info about the bucket type.
> {code:java}
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# ozone sh bucket link /vol1/buck1 /s3v/linkedbuck1
> 22/05/17 07:56:24 INFO rpc.RpcClient: Creating Bucket: s3v/linkedbuck1, with
> root as owner and Versioning false and Storage Type set to DISK and
> Encryption set to false
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# ozone sh bucket info /s3v/linkedbuck1
> {
> "volumeName" : "s3v",
> "bucketName" : "linkedbuck1",
> "sourceVolume" : "vol1",
> "sourceBucket" : "buck1",
> "creationTime" : "2022-05-17T07:56:24.059Z",
> "modificationTime" : "2022-05-17T07:56:24.059Z"
> }
> [root@repdst-1 ~]# {code}
> Now that we have bucket types , what is the default type when a linked bucket
> is created ?
> Looking at the code it looks like the client would not set the bucket layout
> in bucket args. This would mean the bucket type would be according to the
> default server defined bucket type.
> {code:java}
> BucketArgs.Builder bb = new BucketArgs.Builder()
> .setStorageType(StorageType.DEFAULT)
> .setVersioning(false)
> .setSourceVolume(source.getVolumeName())
> .setSourceBucket(source.getBucketName()); {code}
> This would make it possible to link OBS to FSO and vice-versa. Should this be
> allowed?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
