[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kaijie Chen updated HDDS-7328:
------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.3.0

> Improve Deletion of FSO Paths
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-7328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7328
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Xu Shao Hong
>            Assignee: Xu Shao Hong
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Currently, the deleting speed of paths in the FSO bucket is too slow.
> Every time the DirectoryDeletingService executes(every 1m by default),  it 
> chooses only one path from DeletedDirectroyTable and tries adding its 
> sub-files and sub-dirs into the PurgeDirectories Request. The real deletion 
> happens in OMKeyDeleteResponseWithFSO, which moved all sub-dirs into 
> DeletedDirectroyTable.  Then these sub-dirs will be chosen by the future 
> execution of DirectoryDeletingService.
> In the real production environment, such deletion speed is not applicable. 
> There could be lots of dirs deleted without sub-dirs or sub-files. The dir 
> deletion speed would lag behind the dir creation speed.
> I propose to optimize the logic of the DirectoryDeletingService, we could 
> consume all the quota (ozone.path.deleting.limit.per.task) to delete paths as 
> much as possible. The good news is the PB is already designed to do so, we 
> could add more PurgePathRequest in one PurgeDirectoriesRequest.
> -----------------------------------
> This should be compatible with HDDS-5048.
> This aims to improve the efficiency of the deletion if not enough sub-files 
> or sub-dirs are chosen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to