[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17675683#comment-17675683
 ] 

Ethan Rose commented on HDDS-7594:
----------------------------------

{quote}
With the folder created in this manner, any subsequent put request with the 
same name may overwrite the object.  There are cases like this that I'll follow 
up on.  Is this an issue for us? 
{quote}

This behavior should delegate to the underlying FSO bucket's handling in this 
case. This would mean that if the directory exists, it cannot be overwritten by 
a key. I think this would be fine. If a client is interacting with the bucket 
through s3a then it would expect directory creation and not do something like 
{{mkdir /vol/bucket/key1/key2}} then {{key put /vol/bucket/key1}}.

> [FSO] Folders created through S3G are created on file system as "files".
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-7594
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7594
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Neil Joshi
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: S3G FSO Folder creation support.png
>
>
> With FSO bucket layout buckets, folders created with the s3-gateway create 0 
> byte files on file system.  Unlike Object Store bucket layout buckets that 
> create folders correctly when created through the s3-gateway, folder creation 
> on FSO buckets with s3 gateway results in 0 byte files.  Expected is the same 
> behaviour.  This has caused problems with interoperability for applications 
> accessing ozone through both ofs and the s3 gateway, such as Trino.
>  
> Problem can be produced issuing aws-cli folder creation to the s3 gateway on 
> an ozone cluster layout {*}FILE_SYSTEM_OPTIMIZED{*}:
>  
> {code:java}
> bash-4.2$ ozone sh bucket create --layout=FILE_SYSTEM_OPTIMIZED /s3v/bucketfso
> ozone$ aws s3api --profile ozone --endpoint http://localhost:9878 put-object 
> --bucket bucketfso --key test1
> ozone$ aws s3api --profile ozone --endpoint http://localhost:9878 put-object 
> --bucket bucketfso --key test1/README.md --body ./README.md
> An error occurred (InvalidRequest) when calling the PutObject operation: An 
> error occurred (InvalidRequest) when calling the PutObject/MPU PartUpload 
> operation: ozone.om.enable.filesystem.paths is enabled Keys are considered as 
> Unix Paths. Path has Violated FS Semantics which caused put operation to fail.
> bash-4.2$ ozone fs -ls ofs://om/s3v/bucketfso Found 2 items -rw-rw-rw-   1 
> hadoop hadoop          0 2022-12-05 22:34 ofs://om/s3v/bucketfso/test1
> {code}
> File is created _when_ a folder is expected.  If it were correctly set it 
> would result in seeing _*drwxrwxrwx*_ for the test1 key as in,
> {code:java}
> drwxrwxrwx   - hadoop hadoop          0 2022-12-05 22:40 
> ofs://om/s3v/bucketfos/test1
> {code}
>  
> In contrast, the  same aws command issued on a *OBJECT_STORE* layout bucket 
> results in :
> {code:java}
> bash-4.2$ ozone sh key list /s3v/bucketobs
> [ {
>   "volumeName" : "s3v",
>   "bucketName" : "bucketobs",
>   "name" : "test1",
>   "dataSize" : 0,
>   "creationTime" : "2022-12-05T22:33:21.737Z",
>   "modificationTime" : "2022-12-05T22:33:21.746Z",
>   "replicationConfig" : {
>     "replicationFactor" : "ONE",
>     "requiredNodes" : 1,
>     "replicationType" : "RATIS"
>   },
>   "metadata" : { }
> }, {
>   "volumeName" : "s3v",
>   "bucketName" : "bucketobs",
>   "name" : "test1/README.md",
>   "dataSize" : 3879,
>   "creationTime" : "2022-12-05T22:34:02.402Z",
>   "modificationTime" : "2022-12-05T22:37:00.758Z",
>   "replicationConfig" : {
>     "replicationFactor" : "ONE",
>     "requiredNodes" : 1,
>     "replicationType" : "RATIS"
>   },
>   "metadata" : { }
> } ]{code}
> As is expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to