[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17787290#comment-17787290
]
Christos Bisias edited comment on HDDS-9665 at 11/17/23 4:24 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~duongnguyen] Thanks for looking into this. You may need a similar setup to
ours. We are using SHA {*}1cf54f34af36b65ff5a59a8a4749d138f9b8f283{*}, it's a
secured cluster with 30 bare-metal datanodes.
Maybe with a larger cluster, you will be able to see more difference between
these two commands. We also have a VM based, test cluster with 3 datanodes and
we couldn't notice a performance difference there.
was (Author: JIRAUSER285705):
[~duongnguyen] Thanks for looking into this. You may need a similar setup to
ours. We are using SHA {*}1cf54f34af36b65ff5a59a8a4749d138f9b8f283{*}, it's a
secured cluster with 30 bare-metal datanodes.
Maybe with a larger cluster, you will be able to see more difference between
these two commands. We also have a test cluster with 3 datanodes and we
couldn't notice a performance difference there.
> DFS/ofs writes have very low performance
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-9665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9665
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Christos Bisias
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image (1).png
>
>
> This command is very slow
> {code:java}
> ozone freon dfsg -s10240000 -n10000 -t10 --path=ofs://om/pe-ofs/
> --prefix="ofs-100GB"{code}
>
> In contrast with this, which is fast
> {code:java}
> ozone freon ockg -s10240000 -n10000 -t10 -b pe-ofs -v vol1
> --prefix="ofs-100GB" {code}
> Check the image below for more writing benchmarks
> !image (1).png|width=833,height=477!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
