[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hemant Kumar updated HDDS-10590:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
SstFilteringService marks the sstFilter flag for a snapshot and updates the 
RocksDB, 
[code|https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/2f2234c7b61714404399ada8f31b3fb4772b613a/hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/SstFilteringService.java#L123].
 It may cause snapshot chain corruption (probably not after the fix: 
https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6443) or data inconsistency due to race 
condition because SstFilteringService updates snapshot info in parallel to 
SnapshotPurge and SnapshotProperty which also update snapshot info. Even tho 
SstFilteringService takes a lock before updating snapshotInfo, SnapshotPurge 
and SnapshotProperty APIs don't take a lock and rely on OMStateMachine because 
OMStateMachine is going to process each request sequentially.
In general, each update to snapshotInfoTable should go through API but that is 
not possible for *SstFilteringService* because *SstFilteringService* runs on 
each OM independently. Hence it is directly updating snapshotInfoTable.
So we need to introduce the lock for SnapshotPurge and SetSnapshotProperty APIs 
unless there is another better way.



  was:
SstFilteringService marks the sstFilter flag for a snapshot and updates the 
RocksDB, 
[code|https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/2f2234c7b61714404399ada8f31b3fb4772b613a/hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/SstFilteringService.java#L123].
 It may cause snapshot chain corruption (probably not after the fix: 
https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6443) or data inconsistency due to race 
condition because SstFilteringService updates snapshot info in parallel to 
SnapshotPurge and SnapshotProperty which also update snapshot info. Even tho 
SstFilteringService takes a lock before updating snapshotInfo, SnapshotPurge 
and SnapshotProperty APIs don't take a lock and rely on OMStateMachince because 
OMStateMachince is going to process each request sequentially.
In general, each update to snapshotInfoTable should go through API but that is 
not possible for *SstFilteringService* because *SstFilteringService* runs on 
each OM independently. Hence it is directly updating snapshotInfoTable.
So we need to introduce the lock for SnapshotPurge and SetSnapshotProperty APIs 
unless there is another better way.




> SstFilteringService updating snapshotInfo directly
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-10590
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10590
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Hemant Kumar
>            Priority: Major
>
> SstFilteringService marks the sstFilter flag for a snapshot and updates the 
> RocksDB, 
> [code|https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/2f2234c7b61714404399ada8f31b3fb4772b613a/hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/SstFilteringService.java#L123].
>  It may cause snapshot chain corruption (probably not after the fix: 
> https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6443) or data inconsistency due to race 
> condition because SstFilteringService updates snapshot info in parallel to 
> SnapshotPurge and SnapshotProperty which also update snapshot info. Even tho 
> SstFilteringService takes a lock before updating snapshotInfo, SnapshotPurge 
> and SnapshotProperty APIs don't take a lock and rely on OMStateMachine 
> because OMStateMachine is going to process each request sequentially.
> In general, each update to snapshotInfoTable should go through API but that 
> is not possible for *SstFilteringService* because *SstFilteringService* runs 
> on each OM independently. Hence it is directly updating snapshotInfoTable.
> So we need to introduce the lock for SnapshotPurge and SetSnapshotProperty 
> APIs unless there is another better way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to