zhoulii opened a new issue, #8884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/issues/8884

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [x] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/paimon/issues) 
and found nothing similar.
   
   
   ### Paimon version
   
   1.0
   
   ### Compute Engine
   
   flink
   
   ### Minimal reproduce step
   
     1. Create a primary-key table with:
   
     lookup.cache = auto
     merge-engine = deduplicate
     sequence.field = <field>
   
     2. Perform a lookup join where the join keys equal the table's primary 
keys.
     3. Partial lookup does not support deduplicate with sequence.field, so 
AUTO falls back to FullCacheLookupTable.
     4. Trigger a compaction and wait for the lookup cache to refresh.
   
   
   ### What doesn't meet your expectations?
   
     After falling back to full cache, the table still has lookup.cache=AUTO. 
Therefore, LookupFileStoreTable.lookupStreamScanMode() incorrectly returns 
FILE_MONITOR instead of using the scan mode for full cache.
   
     FILE_MONITOR treats compaction file replacements as file deletions and 
additions. As a result, full-cache refresh may process all rows in the 
compacted files as DELETE and INSERT operations, even when there are very few 
logical changes.
   
     For large tables, this causes excessive CPU and I/O usage in every lookup 
subtask. With synchronous refresh, it can block the lookup operator, create 
sustained backpressure, and stall the Flink pipeline.
   
     After AUTO falls back to full cache, the effective lookup.cache should be 
changed to FULL, so the normal full-cache scan-mode selection is used.
   
   
   ### Anything else?
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a PR?
   
   - [x] I'm willing to submit a PR!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to