pitrou commented on PR #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/240#issuecomment-2135262026
> > Or will this require that all Parquet implementations have some baseline level of geospatial support? > > I think the minimum would be "ability to access logical type information", which is where the "serialized metadata" (as opposed to thrift-specified metadata) is nice because it would let that evolve without a change to the reader. This seems to be another argument in favor of an "extension type" facility in Parquet. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
