ggershinsky commented on PR #259: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/259#issuecomment-2152538182
> 1. Our reference to the NIST doc should not misleading. In particular, the current wording makes it seem like 2^32 is some kind of binary threshold above which encryption is broken. This is not the case. Yep, this wording will change (per a comment above). > 2. IMHO, when it comes to crypto (or security in general), it's good to promote understanding of the reasons behind the rules, rather than just the rules themselves. But I admit there can be other viewpoints, so will leave it to you or other people to decide. @rdblue @zivanfi @gszadovszky I don't mind a quick general text that describes the reasoning behind the limit, but doesn't go into details. I'll try to put something together. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
