asfimport commented on issue #406: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/issues/406#issuecomment-2184154156
[Jan Finis](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2249?#comment-17691525) / @jfinis: @wgtmac my proposal would be backward compatible. It would only add optional fields, so that legacy readers not implementing the logic could still read the file and legacy writers could also still write files not using this without any code changes. @mapleFU I agree. Treating NaN as larger or smaller than any other value doesn't fit the semantics of all engines. Therefore, my fix for this would enable both types of semantics (and a third semantics, where NaN should be treated as neither larger nor smaller) to work. I guess I'll just create a pull request. We can then start the discussion based on this. Sounds good? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
