desruisseaux commented on code in PR #240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/240#discussion_r1731912542


##########
src/main/thrift/parquet.thrift:
##########
@@ -237,6 +237,98 @@ struct SizeStatistics {
    3: optional list<i64> definition_level_histogram;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Interpretation for edges of GEOMETRY logical type, i.e. whether the edge
+ * between points represent a straight cartesian line or the shortest line on
+ * the sphere. It applies to all non-point geometry objects.
+ */
+enum Edges {
+  PLANAR = 0;
+  SPHERICAL = 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * A custom binary-encoded polygon or multi-polygon to represent a covering of
+ * geometries. For example, it may be a bounding box or an envelope of 
geometries
+ * when a bounding box cannot be built (e.g. a geometry has spherical edges, 
or if
+ * an edge of geographic coordinates crosses the antimeridian). In addition, 
it can
+ * also be used to provide vendor-agnostic coverings like S2 or H3 grids.
+ */
+struct Covering {
+  /**
+   * A type of covering. Currently accepted values: "WKB".
+   */
+  1: required string kind;
+  /**
+   * A payload specific to kind. Below are the supported values:
+   * - WKB: well-known binary of a POLYGON or MULTI-POLYGON that completely
+   *   covers the contents. This will be interpreted according to the same CRS
+   *   and edges defined by the logical type.
+   */
+  2: required binary value;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Bounding box of geometries in the representation of min/max value pair of
+ * coordinates from each axis. Values of Z and M are omitted for 2D geometries.
+ * Filter pushdown on geometries are only safe for planar spatial predicate
+ * but it is recommended that the writer always generates bounding box 
statistics,
+ * regardless of whether the geometries are planar or spherical.

Review Comment:
   > I was thinking in theory you could account for the curves and make the 
bounding box larger
   
   It is possible, e.g. by approximating the geodesics by Bézier curves. But 
few libraries go that far. The same is true for other points. I think that a 
majority of libraries want to stay simple and assume (not always 
conscientiously) that familiar patterns that work so well in Cartesian 
coordinate systems are still true in general.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to