emkornfield commented on PR #221: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221#issuecomment-2978911217
> I am only a guest here and no PMC member, so I don't know how to continue the process. Could someone pick this up and do a vote? I can try to scan through the two proposals again, but I think maybe we should send a note about progress made with the current proposal and the alternative that has been brought up. If the current proposal. We generally haven't had too many complaints about NaNs in general in parquet so I'm inclined to the simplest thing possible here from a specification perspective (but if there are open datasets that we can evaluate impact on prunability, setting the argument with data would be useful). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
