ArnavBalyan commented on PR #3278: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3278#issuecomment-3218895998
> Defaulting to off does not justify it to be a valid feature to the Parquet library. If users want fine-grained control of the subset of configs, do we want to support it? Or if users have built a custom record writer on top of the ParrquetFileWriter (just like what Iceberg did), how do we know it? How does the ParquetRewriter handle different conflicting configs when merging several parquet files? So to me this is a pure application logic which users can handle it well on their side. We don't want to pay for the complexity within the library. Sure sounds good! Will close this PR, I think some of the above should be easy to solve, definitely requires more discussion 👍 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
