paleolimbot commented on PR #526: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/526#issuecomment-3377051058
> However my concern is that Iceberg may come up with a different solution later which diverges from the Parquet spec. I think it's fine to come up with another solution...I don't think there's any solution would change the existing meaning of `xmin` and `xmax` for geometry. We currently have a situation where the same math can be used to interpret GeospatialStatistics regardless of the logical type and am just not sure what it will accomplish to diverge from that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
