[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16648640#comment-16648640
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-4967:
----------------------------------------
Maybe in here:
{code:java}
if (isLocalIndex && previousScan != null &&
previousScan.getScan() != null
&& (((!isReverse &&
Bytes.compareTo(scanPair.getFirst().getAttribute(SCAN_ACTUAL_START_ROW),
previousScan.getScan().getStopRow()) <
0)
|| (isReverse &&
Bytes.compareTo(scanPair.getFirst().getAttribute(SCAN_ACTUAL_START_ROW),
previousScan.getScan().getStopRow()) >
0)
||
(Bytes.compareTo(scanPair.getFirst().getStopRow(),
previousScan.getScan().getStopRow()) == 0))
&&
Bytes.compareTo(scanPair.getFirst().getAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX),
previousScan.getScan().getAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX))==0)) {
continue;
}
{code}
In BaseResultIterator. No clue what this is doing, no comment of course.
_GRRRRR_
> Reverse scan along LOCAL index does not always return all data
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4967
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4967-test.txt
>
>
> Will attach a test-case soon.
> (Note that this independent of PHOENIX-4964)
> I've not been able to make this fail in any real usage. There seems to be
> something specific about this test.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
