[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16684576#comment-16684576
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-5000:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12947888/PHOENIX-5000.master.004.patch
  against master branch at commit d9d8fd0c449553f3abc9a6e7cba917378ee12e8d.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12947888

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 1 release 
audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +     * Requires {@link #createUsers(int)} to have been called with a value 
greater than {@code offset}.
+     * @param offset The "number" for the principal whose keytab should be 
returned. One-based, not zero-based.
+        UserGroupInformation ugi = 
UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI(princ1, keytab1.getPath());
+                
connections.add(ConnectionInfo.create(url).normalize(ReadOnlyProps.EMPTY_PROPS, 
EMPTY_PROPERTIES));
+        UserGroupInformation ugi = 
UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI(princ1, keytab1.getPath());
+                
connections.add(ConnectionInfo.create(url).normalize(ReadOnlyProps.EMPTY_PROPS, 
EMPTY_PROPERTIES));
+        UserGroupInformation ugiCopy = 
UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI(princ1, keytab1.getPath());
+        UserGroupInformation ugi1 = 
UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI(princ1, keytab1.getPath());
+        UserGroupInformation ugi2 = 
UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI(princ2, keytab2.getPath());
+                
connections.add(ConnectionInfo.create(url).normalize(ReadOnlyProps.EMPTY_PROPS, 
EMPTY_PROPERTIES));

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexSplitReverseScanIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.PartialIndexRebuilderIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.ConcurrentMutationsIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.UpsertSelectAutoCommitIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexSplitForwardScanIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.ViewIT

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2143//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2143//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2143//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Make SecureUserConnectionsTest as Integration test
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5000
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5000
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Karan Mehta
>            Assignee: Karan Mehta
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5000.master.001.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5000.master.002.patch, PHOENIX-5000.master.003.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5000.master.004.patch
>
>
> SecureUserConnectionsTest is marked as unit test even though it starts a 
> MiniKdc as part of its setup. Moreover it is flaky since it fails to find 
> Kerberos realm on Jenkins boxes. Since this unit test fails, it doesn't allow 
> other Integration tests to run.
> This Jira is aimed two fold, first to move this to IT and second understand 
> the reason for flakyness.
> [~tdsilva] FYI.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to