[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16697327#comment-16697327
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4971:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12949289/PHOENIX-4971-master-v6.patch
  against master branch at commit 6214c79f08ae5a106262fc8a1c644d3a4b34c7e2.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12949289

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 1 release 
audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +                        "CREATE VIEW " + view1 + " (PK VARCHAR PRIMARY 
KEY, " + CF + ".COL VARCHAR)");
+                        "CREATE VIEW " + view3 + " (PK VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY, " 
+ CF + ".COL VARCHAR)");
+            String createTable = "CREATE TABLE " + tableName + "  (id varchar 
not null primary key, col integer)";
+                assertTrue(e.getErrorCode() == 
SQLExceptionCode.PARENT_TABLE_NOT_FOUND.getErrorCode());
+                                new DropTableStatement(viewTableName, 
PTableType.VIEW, true, true, true));
+     PARENT_TABLE_NOT_FOUND(536, "42913", "Can't drop the index because the 
parent table in the DROP statement is incorrect."),
+            PTable ptable = connection.getTable(new 
PTableKey(connection.getTenantId(), fullTableName));
+            if (parentTableName != null 
&&!parentTableName.equals(ptable.getParentTableName().getString())) {

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.ConcurrentMutationsIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.UpsertSelectAutoCommitIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexSplitReverseScanIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexSplitForwardScanIT
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.join.HashJoinMoreIT

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2165//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2165//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2165//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Drop index will execute successfully using Incorrect name of parent tables
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4971
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.14.1
>            Reporter: Jaanai
>            Assignee: Jaanai
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.15.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4971-master-v2.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4971-master-v3.patch, PHOENIX-4971-master-v4.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4971-master-v5-it-fixed.patch, PHOENIX-4971-master-v6.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4971-master.patch
>
>
> The blew SQL will be executed successfully,  the name of data tables is 
> incorrectly inputted that the parent table has the same name with index 
> tables.
>  
> {code:java}
> DROP INDEX INDEX_TABLE_X on INDEX_TABLE_X;
> {code}
> Some regions will not online and some queries will not normally execute after 
> executing above SQL.  Everything will be ok unless manually delete dirty 
> metadata information in SYSTEM.CATALOG table.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to