[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16734949#comment-16734949
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-5090:
---------------------------------------
The row keys are needed to rollback the transaction, so you’d need to disallow
users from performing that. Perhaps you could use a time ranged scan over the
entire table to find the rows to delete if you’d want to support a user
rollback.
You’d also need to write the shadow cells as each batch of rows is written to
HBase instead of as a post commit action.
> Discuss: Allow transactional writes without buffering the entire transaction
> on the client.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5090
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5090
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently it is not possible execute transactions in Phoenix that are too
> large to be buffered entirely on the client.
> Both Tephra and Omid support writing uncommitted data to HBase immediately
> and at full speed. The client still needs to keep tracks of the rows changes
> for:
> # Conflict detection
> # (for Omid) writing the shadow cells
> I'd like to do some brainstorming here.
> * It should *always* be enough to only hold on to the changed rows (and
> columns?) only for _conflict resolution_ and free the rest from the client as
> soon as the uncommitted data is written to HBase.
> * For the shadows cells we need only keep the rows changed, right?
> * There are situations where we can avoid the client site buffering entirely
> (perhaps only for Tephra) when we declare a table or upsert not to
> participate in conflict resolution.
> [~tdsilva], [~ohads], [~yonigo], [~jamestaylor], [~vincentpoon], more, better
> ideas?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
