[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17077507#comment-17077507
]
Kadir OZDEMIR commented on PHOENIX-5528:
----------------------------------------
After having a brief discussion on this with [~abhishek.chouhan], I realized
that I did not describe whether we update the time range for a scan on table
region at the client or server side. It needs to be done on the client side.
Assume that the client needs to do a row key range scan. It first identifies
the table regions to be scanned. Then the client needs to make RPC calls to get
the maxTs values from the region servers serving for these table regions. After
that the client can update the time range for scans and then issue the scans.
In this example, scans may need to be issued sequentially. The process is the
same for the scans that are issued in parallel too.
[~abhishek.chouhan] also mentioned that there might be a way to derive the
initial maxTs from the metadata for the table region (without doing a table
region scan). He kindly offered to look into this. If that is possible, then we
do not need to the approximation I mentioned above.
> Race condition in index verification causes multiple index rows to be
> returned for single data table row
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5528
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5528
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Vincent Poon
> Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5528.master.001.patch
>
>
> Warning: This is an artificially generated scenario that likely has a very
> low probability of happening in practice. But a race condition nevertheless.
> Unfortunately I don't have a test case, but was able to produce this by
> debugging a local regionserver and adding breakpoints at the right places to
> produce the ordering here.
> The core problem is that when we do an update to the data table, we produce
> two unverified index rows at first. When we scan both of these index rows
> and attempt to verify via rebuilding the data table row, we cannot guarantee
> that both verifications happen before the data table update, or both happen
> after the data table update.
> I use multiple index regions here to demonstrate, but I believe it could
> happen within a single region as well.
> Steps:
> 1) Create a test table with "pk" and "indexed_val" columns, and a global
> index on "indexed_val".
> 2) upsert into test values ('test_pk', 'test_val');
> 3) Split the index table on 'test_pk':
> hbase shell: split 'test_index', 'test_pk'.
> This creates two regions, call them regionA and regionB (which holds the
> existing index row)
> 3) start an update: upsert into test values ('test_pk', 'new_val');
> The first thing the indexing code does is create two unverified index
> rows: one is a new version of the existing index row, and the other is for
> the new indexed value.
> We pause the thread after this is done, before the row locks and data
> table write happens.
> 4) select indexed_val from test;
> This scans both the index regions in parallel. Each scan picks up a
> unverified row in its region. We pause in GlobalIndexChecker.
> Let the regionB scan proceed. It will attempt to rebuild the data table
> row. The data table still has 'test_val' as the indexed value. The rebuild
> succeeds.
> scan on regionA still paused.
> 5) The original update proceeds to update the data table indexed value to
> 'new_val'.
> 6) The scan on regionA proceeds, and attempted to rebuild the data table row.
> The rebuild succeeds with 'new_val' as the indexed value.
> 7) Both 'test_val' and 'new_val' are returned to the client, because both
> rebuilds succeeded.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
