[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17163514#comment-17163514
]
Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-6013:
------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13008237/PHOENIX-6013-4.x.patch
against 4.x branch at commit a8d6ba036bc15eb66004a99e88a5d8a4fd1cab4c.
ATTACHMENT ID: 13008237
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 5 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}. The patch introduces the following lines
longer than 100:
+ public void
testIndexMultiColumnsMultiIndexesVariableLengthNullLiteralsRVCOffset() throws
SQLException {
+ String createIndex1 = "CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS " +
longKeyIndex1Name + " ON " + longKeyTableName + " (k2 ,v1, k4)";
+ String sql0 = "SELECT v1,v3 FROM " + longKeyTableName + " LIMIT 3
OFFSET (k1 ,k2, k3, k4, k5, k6)=('0','1',null,null,null,'2')";
+ try(Statement statement = conn.createStatement(); ResultSet rs =
statement.executeQuery(sql0)) {
+ byte[] startRow =
phoenixResultSet.getStatement().getQueryPlan().getScans().get(0).get(0).getStartRow();
+ byte[] expectedRow = new byte[] {'0',0,'1',0,0,0,0,'2',1}; //note
trailing 1 not 0 due to phoenix internal inconsistency
+ String sql = "SELECT k2,v1,k4 FROM " + longKeyTableName + " LIMIT 3
OFFSET (k2,v1,k4,k1,k3,k5,k6)=('2',null,'4','1','3','5','6')";
+ try(Statement statement = conn.createStatement(); ResultSet rs =
statement.executeQuery(sql)) {
+ byte[] startRow =
phoenixResultSet.getStatement().getQueryPlan().getScans().get(0).get(0).getStartRow();
+ byte[] expectedRow = new byte[]
{'2',0,0,'4',0,'1',0,'3',0,'5',0,'6',1}; //note trailing 1 not 0 due to phoenix
internal inconsistency
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.DynamicColumnIT
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4073//testReport/
Code Coverage results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4073//artifact/phoenix-core/target/site/jacoco/index.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4073//console
This message is automatically generated.
> RVC Offset does not handle coerced literal nulls properly.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-6013
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6013
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.15.0
> Reporter: Daniel Wong
> Assignee: Daniel Wong
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.16.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-6013-4.x.patch
>
> Time Spent: 1h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As part of query rewrite paths the offset may go through the A=null gets
> rewritten to A IS NULL, the code sanity checks against an equality comparison
> op which is not the case on this rewrite.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
