[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17164934#comment-17164934
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-5958:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13008408/PHOENIX-5958-4.x-v2.patch
  against 4.x branch at commit ce83d74050a8cc1637068f3fb8980e14f9bde611.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 13008408

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +     * TODO: Update all comments since we don't go here if diverged view 
created by pre-4.15 client. Also try to simplify
+                        if (!isDiverged && ancestorColumn.getTimestamp() > 
existingColumn.getTimestamp()) {
+                    } else {// TODO: Check this case. and especially inner if 
condition since ancestorColumn.isExcluded() can never be true here.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.UpgradeIT

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4078//testReport/
Code Coverage results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4078//artifact/phoenix-core/target/site/jacoco/index.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/4078//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Diverged view created via an older client still sees dropped column data
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5958
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5958
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.15.0
>            Reporter: Chinmay Kulkarni
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 5.1.0, 4.16.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5958-4.x-v2.patch
>
>
> By "diverged view" I mean creating a view and then dropping one of the 
> inherited columns from the view. Steps to reproduce:
> Start a 4.x server and connect with a pre-4.15 (I tried a 4.14.3) client
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS S.T (A INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, B INTEGER);
> CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS S.V (new_col INTEGER) AS SELECT * FROM S.T;
> UPSERT INTO S.T VALUES(1,2);
> ALTER VIEW S.V DROP COLUMN B;
> SELECT * FROM S.T; 
> +----+------+
> | A  |  B   |
> +----+------+
> | 1  |  2   |
> +----+------+
> SELECT * FROM S.V; gives:
> +----+------+----------+
> | B  |  A   |  NEW_COL |
> +----+------+----------+
> | 2  |  1   |  null    |
> +----+------+----------+
> {code}
> Though the column 'B' has been dropped from the view. This is a problem for 
> both when phoenix.allow.system.catalog.rollback=true or false. This exact bug 
> does not happen for a 4.x client, though PHOENIX-6030 and PHOENIX-6032 
> highlight other issues related to this code path for 4.x clients. 
>  The problem is mostly due to changes introduced by 
> [PHOENIX-4893|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4893]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to