[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17698645#comment-17698645
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-6821:
-----------------------------------------

tkhurana commented on code in PR #1570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1570#discussion_r1131720519


##########
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/exception/SQLExceptionCode.java:
##########
@@ -649,6 +652,14 @@ public SQLException newException(SQLExceptionInfo info) {
                 return new PhoenixParserException(info.getMessage(), 
info.getRootCause());
             }
             
+        };
+        public static final Factory BATCH = new Factory() {

Review Comment:
   Maybe use name BATCH_UPDATE_ERROR



##########
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/jdbc/PhoenixStatement.java:
##########
@@ -1993,19 +1992,31 @@ public void clearBatch() throws SQLException {
     @Override
     public int[] executeBatch() throws SQLException {
         int i = 0;
+        int[] returnCodes = new int [batch.size()];
+        Arrays.fill(returnCodes, -1);
+        boolean autoCommit = connection.getAutoCommit();
+        connection.setAutoCommit(false);
         try {
-            int[] returnCodes = new int [batch.size()];
             for (i = 0; i < returnCodes.length; i++) {
                 PhoenixPreparedStatement statement = batch.get(i);
-                returnCodes[i] = statement.execute(true) ? 
Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO : statement.getUpdateCount();
+                statement.executeForBatch();
+                returnCodes[i] = statement.getUpdateCount();
             }
             // Flush all changes in batch if auto flush is true
             flushIfNecessary();
             // If we make it all the way through, clear the batch
             clearBatch();
             return returnCodes;
-        } catch (Throwable t) {
-            throw new BatchUpdateExecution(t,i);
+        } catch (SQLException t) {
+            throw new BatchUpdateException(returnCodes, t);

Review Comment:
   On exceptions shouldn't we set all the return codes to 
`Statement.EXECUTE_FAILED` since we don't know which individual query failed ?



##########
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/jdbc/PhoenixStatement.java:
##########
@@ -1993,19 +1992,31 @@ public void clearBatch() throws SQLException {
     @Override
     public int[] executeBatch() throws SQLException {
         int i = 0;
+        int[] returnCodes = new int [batch.size()];

Review Comment:
   The javadoc for `executeBatch()` function needs to be updated





> Batching with auto-commit connections
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-6821
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6821
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kadir Ozdemir
>            Assignee: Hari Krishna Dara
>            Priority: Major
>
> Phoenix commits the commands of a batch individually when executeBatch() is 
> called if auto commit is enabled on the connection.  For example, if a batch 
> of 100 upsert statements is created using addBatch() within an auto-commit 
> mode connection then when executeBatch() is called, Phoenix creates 100 HBase 
> batches each with a single mutation, i.e., one for each upsert. This defeats 
> the purpose of batching. The correct behavior is to commit the entire batch 
> of upsert statements using the minimum number of HBase batches. This means if 
> the entire batch of upsert statements fits in a single HBase batch, then one 
> HBase batch should be used.
> Please note for connections without auto-commit, Phoenix behaves correctly, 
> that is, the entire batch of upsert commands is committed using the minimum 
> number of HBase batches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to