[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17793618#comment-17793618
]
Istvan Toth commented on PHOENIX-7141:
--------------------------------------
Surprisingly, 5.1 has almost as much unshaded stuff as master.
Unshaded packages in 5.1 HEAD:
* com.beust: coming from omid, see OMID-267
* io.netty (4.1): coming from zk and omid-transaction-client
* javax.inject: coming form omid, I think we can safely relocate it
* mozilla: ????
* tables: we are shading this in the clients, I see no reason not do the same
in server
* org.checkerframework: Seems to be an interaction between checker-qual coming
via hadoop-common -> guava, and guava
* org.codehaus.mojo.animalsniffer: TBD
* org.yaml.snakeyaml: TBD
* org.apache.commons.configuration: TBD
* org.apache.commons.configuration2: TBD
* org.apache.commons.csv: TBD
* org.apache.curator: TBD
* org.apache.statemachine: TBD
I was hoping that 5.1 has less problem, but this is not the case.
> hbase-server shading problems
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-7141
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7141
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Istvan Toth
> Priority: Blocker
>
> HBase-server is different from the rest of the shaded artifacts in that it it
> doesn't shade packages by default.
> As new dependencies were added to Phoenix, we were left with an hbase-server
> jar which includes unshaded libraries which potentially conflict with the
> hbase server classpath.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
