tkhurana commented on code in PR #1884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1884#discussion_r1621488729
##########
phoenix-core-server/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/hbase/index/IndexRegionObserver.java:
##########
@@ -1308,6 +1345,19 @@ public void
postBatchMutateIndispensably(ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnviro
try {
if (success) {
context.currentPhase = BatchMutatePhase.POST;
+ for (int i = 0; i < miniBatchOp.size(); i++) {
+ BatchMutateContext.UpdateStatus updateStatus =
context.getUpdateStatus(i);
+ if
(BatchMutateContext.UpdateStatus.UPDATE.equals(updateStatus)) {
+ byte[] retVal = PInteger.INSTANCE.toBytes(1);
+ Cell cell = PhoenixKeyValueUtil.newKeyValue(
+ miniBatchOp.getOperation(i).getRow(),
+ EMPTY_BYTE_ARRAY, EMPTY_BYTE_ARRAY, 0, retVal, 0,
+ retVal.length);
+ Result result = Result.create(new
ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(cell)));
+ miniBatchOp.setOperationStatus(i,
+ new OperationStatus(OperationStatusCode.SUCCESS,
result));
+ }
+ }
Review Comment:
After we introduce the check `if(context.hasAtomic && miniBatchOp.size() ==
1)` what value is the map bringing ? Is it enough to justify maintaining a new
map considering we are only using for batch size 1 ? I would recommend not
maintaining the map at all for now. We can revisit this later in a subsequent
PR on how to return Result object
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
