xavifeds8 opened a new pull request, #2480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/2480

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://phoenix.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR.
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP] 
PHOENIX-XXXX Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes, and 
prefix it with the JIRA id, e.g. 'PHOENIX-XXXX Your PR title ...'.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   Added a ScanUtil.hasDynamicColumns(table) check in 
WhereCompiler.setScanFilter() so that when the WHERE clause references multiple 
columns and the table has dynamic columns, Phoenix falls back to 
MultiCQKeyValueComparisonFilter (HashMap-based, raw byte comparison) instead of 
MultiEncodedCQKeyValueComparisonFilter (array-based, expects encoded integer 
qualifiers).
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   When a table uses column encoding (the default) and the WHERE clause filters 
on multiple dynamic columns, Phoenix selects 
MultiEncodedCQKeyValueComparisonFilter. This filter calls 
encodingScheme.decode() on each column qualifier, expecting a 2-4 byte encoded 
integer. 
   Dynamic columns use the actual column name as the qualifier (e.g., 
"POPULATION" = 10 bytes), causing InvalidQualifierBytesException: Expected 
length: 2. Actual: 10. 
   Single dynamic column in WHERE works fine because 
SingleCQKeyValueComparisonFilter uses raw byte comparison. The workaround was 
COLUMN_ENCODED_BYTES=NONE on table creation, which defeats the purpose of 
encoding.
   
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates 
are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Phoenix versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   Yes. Queries with multiple dynamic columns in the WHERE clause now work 
correctly on tables with column encoding enabled (the default). Previously 
these queries threw InvalidQualifierBytesException. No workaround 
(COLUMN_ENCODED_BYTES=NONE) is needed anymore
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   
   
   5 new unit tests in WhereCompilerTest verifying correct filter selection:
   
   1. Single dynamic column → SingleCQKeyValueComparisonFilter
   2. Multiple dynamic columns → MultiCQKeyValueComparisonFilter (not Encoded)
   3. Multiple schema columns → MultiEncodedCQKeyValueComparisonFilter (no 
regression)
   4. Non-encoded table → MultiCQKeyValueComparisonFilter
   5. Single schema column → SingleCQKeyValueComparisonFilter
   
   1 new integration test in DynamicColumnIT covering 7 scenarios:
   1. No dynamic columns (baseline)
   2. 1 dynamic column in WHERE
   3. 2 dynamic columns in WHERE
   4. 3 dynamic columns in WHERE
   5. 1 schema + 2 dynamic (mixed)
   6. 2 dynamic + 1 schema (mixed)
   7. Dynamic columns compared to each other
   
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   Yes. This patch was co-authored with Claude Code opus-4.6.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to